Posted on 7th November 2008 at 17:59 by Scarlet Lotus Sexgeek
Filed under: Books
Tagged: , , , , , , ,
pomo PoMoSexuals: Challenging Assumptions about Gender and Sexuality PoMoSexuals: Challenging Assumptions about Gender and Sexuality

PoMoSexuals: Challenging Assumptions About Gender and Sexuality PoMoSexuals: Challenging Assumptions about Gender and Sexuality is an anthology of essays edited by and Lawrence Schimel that is essentially a smack in the face to traditional and even some non-traditional ideas of and . It refutes any idea of any sort of binary along either of those lines.

Through reading the essays the reader gets multiple examples of people who don’t fit into the neat little boxes that both and het society tries to push them into. Because there are so many, one right after the other, each building on the next and each becoming more strange, more , more PoMo than the last, there is no way to deny that these people are not just flukes.

For me, I found some soulmates in this book. I found people struggling with the same ideas I do and asking the same questions I’ve been asking for years: where do I fit in if I’m sort of this and sort of that and everything and nothing? How do I navigate these and galaxies if I can’t pin myself down and comprehend where everything in me is coming from?

The essays in some cases are roads of self-discovery, showing just a glimpse of what one goes through when one box is not an option, and what is possible when you embrace not fitting in. Other essays were dissecting specific ideas or impulses that the authors had which were somehow out of their comfort zone, such as a gay man wanting to fuck a woman, how males and females can interact outside of a heterosexual paradigm, how a female can be a woman stuck in a man’s body, and various other genders and sexualities.

If you’ve ever not fit into the boxes the world gives us, which is just about everyone in my experience, I would say you need to read this book. Even if you don’t identify directly with those in the stories it will blow your mind and make you reorganize your thinking about the way that and work. It will help you recognize that you are not alone, there are others like you who can’t fit into the boxes.

Even if you know that already, because I certainly did know that there were others who feel like I do going into it, you will still get a sense of camaraderie of validation that while you are unique in your own and expression there may be others who are just as or more fucked up than you are. And I mean fucked up in a good way, of course. ;)

technorati PoMoSexuals: Challenging Assumptions about Gender and Sexuality delicious PoMoSexuals: Challenging Assumptions about Gender and Sexuality stumbleupon PoMoSexuals: Challenging Assumptions about Gender and Sexuality digg PoMoSexuals: Challenging Assumptions about Gender and Sexuality google PoMoSexuals: Challenging Assumptions about Gender and Sexuality linkedin PoMoSexuals: Challenging Assumptions about Gender and Sexuality twitter PoMoSexuals: Challenging Assumptions about Gender and Sexuality

Submit this content to FetSpank.com

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Related posts:

Posted on 2nd November 2008 at 12:16 by Scarlet Lotus Sexgeek
Filed under: Books, Community: Butch/Femme
Tagged: , , , ,
tLD&tF The Leather Daddy and the Femme The Leather Daddy and the Femme

How do I start a review of a book which speaks to me in such personal and intimate ways, beyond being about sex? How do I begin to describe the ways this book has clicked with me? I guess by answering those questions.

The brilliance of the book is that it delves into theory while still having an element of smut in it, mixing the two together in a true -esque way, because in some ways it’s impossible to seperate the smut from the theory and the theory from the smut. The first book I read of ’s was Real Live Nude Girl back nearly four years ago when I was still living in Oregon.

I fell in love with her then, realizing how similar we were, wanting to become like her, to explore my own and look at it through the lens of theory. She was my inspiration for nearly all that I do now, and all I’m working toward including San Francisco and The Institute for Advanced Study of Human Sexuality.

I found Leather Daddy and the Femme The Leather Daddy and the Femme by to be not only wonderful hot get-your-genitals-stirring smut but also an interesting look at and identity . It starts off with the meeting of Miranda/Randy and Jack, then follows their relationship as it progresses, adding in a third partner, Demetrius, and playing with others as well. It is a wonderful genderfucking depiction of a gay leather daddy and his boy/ and the creation of a family.

I found that the and relationships within The Leather Daddy and the Femme were some of the closest depictions to what I consider perfect. This wouldn’t be true for everyone, of course, not everyone would have such a personal reaction to the book, dreaming of being in an open and poly-committed relationship or having two different but equal genders that are easy to step into. I found myself identifying in some way with all of the characters and realizing that my dream situation is one very similar to what Jack, Miranda, and Demetrius have, with slight modifications of course.

In some ways the situation in the book is similar to my own, it emphasizes that queerness isn’t restricted to same sex relationships, that there are more ways for males and females to interact sexually and romantically than within a heterosexual model. Something I’ve thought was true for years, but that is difficult for me to describe.

The biggest thing that Leather Daddy and the Femme The Leather Daddy and the Femme did for me, I think, was make me think about my own identity, my own desire for a chosen family (as opposed to born family), my desire for multiple lovers, for sex, for my own embracing of my multigendered self. It opened me up to looking at my own and sexual identity paths, how I got here and where I want to go from here. Oh, and it also made me wet.

I could probably go on for pages about exactly how it touched me, about what part of which characters I would like to inhabit, what I have thought of due to the book, how it has changed my perceptions and desires… but those things are all for posts previous and to come. Instead, I’d love if you have read it for you to give your reaction to the book in the comments.

technorati The Leather Daddy and the Femme delicious The Leather Daddy and the Femme stumbleupon The Leather Daddy and the Femme digg The Leather Daddy and the Femme google The Leather Daddy and the Femme linkedin The Leather Daddy and the Femme twitter The Leather Daddy and the Femme

Submit this content to FetSpank.com

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Related posts:

Posted on 30th August 2008 at 23:41 by Scarlet Lotus Sexgeek
Filed under: Community: Queer
Tagged: , ,

Found here at Queers United

Inspired by a right-wing blog I read that was advocating for their readers to request “ex-gay” books for their local libraries I decided to post a reverse entry.

Your local library is about serving the community, they want to carry books and videos that their residents want.

They have a suggestion box or email form, why not go ahead and list some good political books, coming out resource guides, and history books to be added to the shelves?

In addition to requesting new books, make sure to take out the existing books on culture so that the libraries do not discontinue these books.

Many libraries have been forced to place LGBTQ books on high shelves due to community outcry, making it harder or virtually impossible for people to have access to them. Speak to the head librarian and demand that the books are visible and available for those who want them.

It seems like a wonderful idea to me, and I’ve checked the Salt Lake City Library for some authors and titles, and was pleasantly surprised at some of the things they have there, though not too surprised as SLC itself is pretty liberal and friendly. Best would be going to the library in one of the surrounding extremely conservative cities and doing this, and I’m placing it on my to do list.

I’ve had a somewhat sexless weekend despite it being our anniversary weekend, we just keep doing things other until we’re too tired to fuck. We did buy a fur flogger last night, which is “impact caressing” as Dominus dubbed it. I love it so much, plus it means I’ll get to flog him! I’m a fan. More later.

technorati Library Request Activism delicious Library Request Activism stumbleupon Library Request Activism digg Library Request Activism google Library Request Activism linkedin Library Request Activism twitter Library Request Activism

Submit this content to FetSpank.com

Technorati Tags: , ,

Related posts:

Posted on 21st August 2008 at 22:46 by Scarlet Lotus Sexgeek
Filed under: Half-Nekkid Thursday
Tagged: , ,
HNT4 The (Leather Daddy and the Femme) Bibliophile HNT
Click here for the larger version.

In true FFToy fashion, because I have been completely devouring this book and it’s the only thing I can really think about and because it is not only crazy hot but in some ways a perfect articulation of some of my own desires, I decided for my HNT this week it should include the book that has been on my mind since I started reading it. The Leather Daddy and the Femme is not a perfect articulation of all of desires, but it is damn close. I highly recommend anyone who hasn’t read it to read it. Once I have finished it (which shouldn’t be too long) I will write a review of it. Should be fantastic.

If you look, you can see one of my tattoos peeking out above the book (no, it’s not two spoons, promise) I call it “lovers entwined.” But you do get to see my pretty polka-dot bra I got from Lane Bryant, as well as a bit of my collar, both public and home (the heart necklace is my public collar). My hair looks less red than it is, but that’s mostly ’cause of the light.

I have nothing terribly interesting to say tonight. Happy HNT, hope you enjoyed the picture, and go pick up The Leather Daddy and the Femme. Oh, and keep an eye out for the book review, coming soon.

HNT.0 The (Leather Daddy and the Femme) Bibliophile HNT

technorati The (Leather Daddy and the Femme) Bibliophile HNT delicious The (Leather Daddy and the Femme) Bibliophile HNT stumbleupon The (Leather Daddy and the Femme) Bibliophile HNT digg The (Leather Daddy and the Femme) Bibliophile HNT google The (Leather Daddy and the Femme) Bibliophile HNT linkedin The (Leather Daddy and the Femme) Bibliophile HNT twitter The (Leather Daddy and the Femme) Bibliophile HNT

Submit this content to FetSpank.com

Technorati Tags: , ,

Related posts:

Posted on 20th August 2008 at 15:59 by Scarlet Lotus Sexgeek
Filed under: Community: Butch/Femme, Identity: Femme Drag Queen, Sex Toy Love
Tagged: , , , ,

I’ve been thinking a lot about cock lately, ever since I posted on the subject. I haven’t only been thinking about the acquisition of one, however, but also what it means to have a cock, and what it means that my cock is . On one hand, it’s a very minuscule difference. I mean, what does it matter if my cock is , , genderqueer, a dildo, or any other label that I put on it? It’s still a cock, right? It’s still a piece of silicone. On the other hand, cocks are not thought of as or feminine. Cocks are, as we generally associate them with males, usually considered a masculine item.

So, what does it really mean to have a cock? What’s the big deal? For one thing, when a cock is strapped on it is pretty much assumed that the strapper is masculine in some way. While there are many people who do not make this assumption I would say that the overwhelming majority do. Though it does seem like pegging (female penetrating a male with a strap on) has been getting more popular lately with videos like Bend Over Boyfriend and lots of beginner strap-on kits popping up all over the place. Even then, however, the penetrator is still thought of as taking on the masculine role even if the penetrator isn’t thought of as masculine.

Penetration is nearly always considered a masculine act, even if done by a feminine body. Rarely do you see a dildo called Felicity or Sophia, instead we see Leo, General, Magnum, and Throb. That’s not to say that there aren’t female-named dildos like Goddess, Mistress, Wanda, and the ever delightful Vicky Venus, but they are nowhere near as common as the others. There have always been vibrators with feminine names, because they are trying to appeal to their target audience, but if you delve into the realm of “realistic” dildos… well, I’ll just say I have yet to see a dildo marketed as realistic named anything feminine (though there could be one or two, I can’t claim to have seen all the dildos in the world). I’m not saying that they should be more common, I wouldn’t make that call, but I am saying that thinking of a dildo as feminine or thinking of penetration as a feminine act is not common.

But what does it really mean for a to have a cock, or for a to pack? There are infinite ways in which a can pack, and an infinite number of reasons and desires which can come out of packing/having a cock. I can’t help but think of an excerpt from The Leather Daddy and the Femme when thinking about cock, and the infinite possibilities:

It was lavender silicone and not shaped like a cock at all. It wasn’t even meant to be a cock, on her. She never got especially turned on to cocks–but strapping on something to fuck with, something that let her pin me to a bed or a wall and let her -energy come exploding out of her and into my or asshole, she liked that just fine. [...] She didn’t think of it as a cock so I didn’t either, but I sure did take it seriously.

This is part of the way I think of my cock, I declare it as a cock but I don’t think of it as a cock but as an extension of my , which is also why I’m not very attracted to realistic-looking cocks for my own personal cock. I wouldn’t be against a realistic-looking (and feeling) cock in my collection, but that wouldn’t be my main cock.

The more I read in The Leather Daddy and the Femme the more I work with and figure out my own queerness. My is so tied in with my , and it’s interesting to have this lovely woman as well as a within me, both aching to get out and both who desire to wear a cock.

This brings me back to the question: what does it mean? Obviously, it can mean a lot of different things depending on who is wearing the cock and who is viewing/feeling the cock. Is there a big difference between someone who embraces packing or strapping on than someone who embraces ? I think there is. That’s not to say that the same meaning couldn’t be applied to the cock or the wearing of the cock in both cases, because it could be, but there would still be a difference. What would that difference be, I’m not entirely sure. Something I’ll have to think on more and get back to you.

technorati My Dick is a Girl delicious My Dick is a Girl stumbleupon My Dick is a Girl digg My Dick is a Girl google My Dick is a Girl linkedin My Dick is a Girl twitter My Dick is a Girl

Submit this content to FetSpank.com

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Related posts:

Posted on 9th May 2008 at 19:25 by Scarlet Lotus Sexgeek
Filed under: Identity: Femme Drag Queen
Tagged: , , , ,

Butch is a Noun is a book I’ve been eyeing for months, but have not actually gotten around to buying yet, by S. Bear Bergman. I found this youtube video of him reading the first chapter of the book, which is called What Butch Is, which I have been told is the best part of the book. You can even read along (or read again, or re-read or watch and then read along) with the PDF excerpt available at Bear’s site.

I am going to watch it a second time… and maybe a third and fourth and…

Along the same lines (of /) Visible: a femmethology has a call for submissions going on. It is due June 1st, and I am working on a piece for it, though I’m worried with everything going on and the trip and everything if I will be able to get it together in time. I’m hoping I will.

Some more information: “Visible: a femmethology is a forthcoming anthology about the power and complications in presenting as a and breaking the traditional meaning of feminine. It aims to showcase personal essays exploring what “” means to those who claim it as an identity.”

Much more information on their website

technorati It’s denim and leather and butch wax, kid, and don’t you forget it. Unless you’re vegan. delicious It’s denim and leather and butch wax, kid, and don’t you forget it. Unless you’re vegan. stumbleupon It’s denim and leather and butch wax, kid, and don’t you forget it. Unless you’re vegan. digg It’s denim and leather and butch wax, kid, and don’t you forget it. Unless you’re vegan. google It’s denim and leather and butch wax, kid, and don’t you forget it. Unless you’re vegan. linkedin It’s denim and leather and butch wax, kid, and don’t you forget it. Unless you’re vegan. twitter It’s denim and leather and butch wax, kid, and don’t you forget it. Unless you’re vegan.

Submit this content to FetSpank.com

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Related posts:

Posted on 31st March 2008 at 17:36 by Scarlet Lotus Sexgeek
Filed under: Identity: cuntpet
Tagged: , , , ,

I’ve been thinking a lot about BDSM in general, as well as the way plays out within BDSM roles, and I’ve come to some discoveries. I’ve been thinking about writing Eros in Leather as I mentioned earlier which would be a M/f spinoff of Venus in Furs, which is F/m. However, there arises a problem, which is partly where my discoveries came from. Venus in Furs (VIF) has very servant-centered submission within it, and this is more difficult to create in a M/f relationship in some ways. The obvious choices are cooking and cleaning and otherwise tending to the Master for the fem submissive, but I’m not sure if they are comparable… though perhaps they are, as they are highly gendered just like Severin’s boy servant position in VIF is.

One discovery: submissives often are given directives which go against cultural expectations in regards to sex, that is, (in my experience) many more males than females are put into chastity, and chastity is rather a huge topic, while many more females than males are thought of as sex slaves or desired to be sexual nearly all the time. While both males and females engage in to an extent, I would wager that the amount and frequency each is allowed to cum is vastly different. This isn’t true for everyone, of course, this is a general statement. I think a lot of this is due to our cultural expectations and stereotypes, and going beyond or the opposite of them adds to the taboo of the situation in general, but I’m sure there is more to this.

Back to VIF (in some ways): Secretary is in some ways the M/f VIF, though with distinct differences. VIF is completely lead by the masochist, Severin, with Wanda going along with it as per his wishes, and not the other way around. While Edward is the first to initiate, Lee ends up being the one to initiate an ongoing relationship past the one they had at work, so there are similarities, but it’s not exact, though I don’t expect it to be. Although, Secretary fixes my issue of how to make the woman more servant-centered, bringing in roles of labor, as VIF had in a very different way.

My Queer Theory Prof. has mentioned many times about her idea that labor and masochism/submission are related somehow, though she has yet to go into detail, and I think this is part of it. A large part of submission is labor, as doing for the Other is part of submission, which can extend to chores and other such things, like doing laundry, cooking, cleaning, tending the garden, fetching drinks, etc. etc. etc. There is a tie between labor and submission, and I may have just hit it on the head, though, again, I think there’s more to it, and there’s more that can be said and explored regarding it.

A side note: I was talking with someone today who mentioned that, regardless of consent, many people think that BDSM is wrong. I also mentioned the sex-positive movement, and he said that he didn’t think it was very widespread. I know that people think both of these things logically, and I know that they vary depending on your circles and such, but I often forget this. I tend to live in a land where I’m accepted for who I am (a big factor of this is probably because I choose to not associate with many people, and this may also be why I don’t feel like venturing out into the land of Utah to make new friends). Sometimes it’s a harsh wakeup call to remember that there are still bigoted, racist, homophobic, sex-negative, anti-feminist, anti-poly, anti-, anti-, anti-genderfucking people out there who would probably hate me on principle if they got to know me. I feel pretty blessed by the people I have in my life, but I also realize a little more where my aversion to new people comes from. I need some sort of formal interviewing process to figure out new friends.

technorati We dont see things as they are, we see them as we are. delicious We dont see things as they are, we see them as we are. stumbleupon We dont see things as they are, we see them as we are. digg We dont see things as they are, we see them as we are. google We dont see things as they are, we see them as we are. linkedin We dont see things as they are, we see them as we are. twitter We dont see things as they are, we see them as we are.

Submit this content to FetSpank.com

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Related posts:

Posted on 25th March 2008 at 14:48 by Scarlet Lotus Sexgeek
Filed under: Community: BDSM
Tagged: , ,

I’m tempted to undergo a book called Eros in Leather as a (M/f) counterpart to Venus in Furs. What do you think?

From what I’ve read of VIF’s contemporary counterpart Senso it does not seem worthy of being the counterpart, and therefore I may have to make one. Or someone will.

Speaking of reading: I really really really need to buy and read The Leather Daddy and the Femme by . I also need to meet Carol Queen and get every book she’s written.

I have Real Live Nude Girl already, and that’s what made me fall in love with her. She’s my idol, seriously. She’s bisexual, she’s , she’s submissive (a switch?), she’s sex-positive, she’s a sex educator, she went to The Institute for Advanced Study of Human Sexuality (which is where I am planning on going for grad school), she’s a writer, she’s an activist, she’s basically everything I want to be, and will be someday (only slightly different).

Basically she rocks my world.

technorati I now now that there can be such a thing as a rose without a thorn delicious I now now that there can be such a thing as a rose without a thorn stumbleupon I now now that there can be such a thing as a rose without a thorn digg I now now that there can be such a thing as a rose without a thorn google I now now that there can be such a thing as a rose without a thorn linkedin I now now that there can be such a thing as a rose without a thorn twitter I now now that there can be such a thing as a rose without a thorn

Submit this content to FetSpank.com

Technorati Tags: , ,

Related posts:

Posted on 23rd March 2008 at 22:41 by Scarlet Lotus Sexgeek
Filed under: Community: BDSM, Identity: Boi Fagette, Identity: cuntpet
Tagged: , , ,

I’m currently reading Venus In Furs for my Queer Theory class. It’s the first time I’ve read it and it really remarks to me the differences between F/m and M/f (and F/f and M/m) more than I could go into, of course, but here are some tidbits which made me think and realize a few things about my own self.

I know that Venus in Furs is not exactly what every F/m couple is, of course, but it does provide interesting insight. I tried to put myself in the position of Severin/Gregor with Master or any man for that matter, and I was unable to imagine it exactly the same, though it could be similar, and I’m sure other people engage in it, but I couldn’t see myself being a servant in the same way. A servant, surely, but there are things such as walking 10 paces behind him while shopping, carrying all his things, or things such as that which I wouldn’t feel comfortable or desire doing. However, things like taking his coat and opening the door for him and such I would be willing to do, waiting on him, things like that, but only certain things are ones I wouldn’t want to do.

For a Mistress, on the other hand, I think I would delight in doing some of the things I don’t see me doing with a Master. Although, I could were I in drag. I could see myself as the servant of some high woman. That could be hot. I would probably end up being a -ish , but a nonetheless. Curious. I could see myself doing those things as a for a Master as well, but not as the that I am.

What accounts for this difference? It’s quite obviously and roles. It’s due to the hyperfemininity which would be expressed by the performing of such actions, which I would find difficulty with should my Master do something like that. This is making me think. I wonder if I shouldn’t have spoken so hastily and discarded activities for all men. I didn’t really see myself to a feminine female except for now I do, and I blame the book. Perhaps it would be different if I were reading a book about a feminine male and his (?) woman.

Thinking about it I do enjoy the idea of a feminine male and his , and that makes me think of Tipping the Velvet, I seem to recall one such couple, as well as the main couple being one I described above, ultrafeminine woman and . I couldn’t see my Master as a feminine male, as he is very much not one, though he does have feminine sides, but not an ultrafeminine male.

Anyway, there were some of my musings. More later, I think. I have work to do.

technorati D/s and Gender Musings delicious D/s and Gender Musings stumbleupon D/s and Gender Musings digg D/s and Gender Musings google D/s and Gender Musings linkedin D/s and Gender Musings twitter D/s and Gender Musings

Submit this content to FetSpank.com

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Related posts:

Posted on 24th February 2008 at 18:14 by Scarlet Lotus Sexgeek
Filed under: Equality
Tagged: ,

An answer to the qotn (question of the now) which I posed a few days ago in slavehood:

What are your thoughts and associations to the word “”?
I’ve had an affinity for the word since I read Cuntt Cunt by Inga Muscio when I was 14ish, I think? Something like that. Not much after that I heard the reclaiming of the word in The Vagina Monologuest Cunt as well, and I have loved it ever since.

I’ve always liked it better than pussy or vagina or twat or any of the other terms for the female genitals, I think it holds a power that is primal and strong and something that can’t be taken away. Since it is such as strong word of female power it has been, of course, twisted to be the worst word to call a woman in our society, worse than bitch or slut or any of the other typical female slurs.

When referring to my own vulva I use the word . I enjoy being called a as well, should it be intended with desire as opposed to hurt. I identify with the word more and more, and have considered it as a potential better word than “slave” as I feel that the connotations of are far better than the connotations of slave, however, it is not a perfect match either.

I find it to be a wonderful word, rich in meaning, power, and association. It can be humiliating and shameful when used in the right contexts, it can be empowering and strong when used in other contexts, and it can be hurtful and painful when used in other (not so fun) contexts, but that is the adaptability and flexibility of meanings of words.

I love my , and I love being a , and I love other cunts too. I love saying and seeing the reactions that I get. I love saying to feel the silky smoothness roll off my tongue. I just love in its entirety.

(more…)

technorati Cunt delicious Cunt stumbleupon Cunt digg Cunt google Cunt linkedin Cunt twitter Cunt

Submit this content to FetSpank.com

Technorati Tags: ,

Related posts: