Posted on 21st July 2008 at 12:55 by Scarlet Lotus Sexgeek
Filed under: Identity: Queer Intellisexual
Tagged: , , ,

Being part of the community has been something extremely important to me since I was in high school, though I came out in middle school. I have always been in one way or another. I was the kid growing up, always the largest in my class, always the one made fun of. I was the outcast. I embraced my queerness, my freakhood, by difference. I wanted to be different, it made me special. I enjoyed it, and I still do.

It was easier to be when I didn’t have a partner, or when I had a female partner. Now that I’m with a male, and specifically living with a male and being submissive to a male it is very difficult for me, and difficult to maintain my queerness when in many ways I look very heterosexual. This isn’t necessarily a negative thing, but for me it kind of is. I feel washed over, I feel like my queerness isn’t as easily recognized as I’d like it to be.

Sometimes even those who know my orientation do not credit it because of my current partner. I am forgotten about as , and it’s really something that hurts me when it comes from those close to me. I may be with a man, but that doesn’t mean I’m still not .

What comes into my identity? What makes it up? Kink and poly definitely inform my queerness, because they inform my and no aspect of my can be analyzed without the addition of all the other aspects. Really, no aspect of my can be analyzed without all other aspects of my identity taken into account, including and size, which is part of the reason why all those are subtitles to this blog, because it’s nearly impossible to understand me without understanding all those first.

It’s difficult to be gendered and partnered with a biologically male and masculine person and to still be labeled as . I can embrace the label all I want, and I can try to make that label known to the rest of the world, but that doesn’t always mean I will come off that way.

I can view the plus side of it, as it means I can walk in the heterosexual world and use terms like “partner” which is the primary way I refer to Master as to new people I meet, and which confuses people or makes people assume that my partner is female. This allows me to get into a dialogue about the term partner, about bi/pan/ sexualities if I so choose.

Now, this is all well and good, and I do try to use it to my advantage as much as possible. I try to sneak in comments like “Just because I’m with a man doesn’t mean I’m straight” or “doesn’t mean I’m not .” There are ways that I can subtly influence those around me, but I often wonder if it is enough. If I constantly have to assert my identity, is it really worth it? But, then again, I have the same issue with my identity. Perhaps my identity fetish is just too advanced for easy identification.

I’ve read about similar experiences with other bi/pan/omni-sexuals and queers, and people with FtM lovers, and I know that I am not alone in this, but that doesn’t make it any less frustrating. I know that this problem will not change any time soon, but maybe I can figure out a better way to deal with it.

technorati My Queer Identity, Or: Problems of Visibility delicious My Queer Identity, Or: Problems of Visibility stumbleupon My Queer Identity, Or: Problems of Visibility digg My Queer Identity, Or: Problems of Visibility google My Queer Identity, Or: Problems of Visibility linkedin My Queer Identity, Or: Problems of Visibility twitter My Queer Identity, Or: Problems of Visibility

Submit this content to FetSpank.com

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Related posts:

Posted on 11th July 2008 at 13:27 by Scarlet Lotus Sexgeek
Filed under: Identity: Femme Drag Queen, Identity: Queer Intellisexual, Sex Toy Love
Tagged: , ,

Many years ago I bought a terra firma harness (with extender strap) and Leo (in black). I have used it many times (though not as many as I would like), on a few different partners, both male and female.

However, most of those partners and occurrences were few and far between. Recently, while Master and I were in England, I used it on him. We had talked about it for quite some time, but we never really got around to me fucking him in the ass. It was very fun, and may have been one of the catalysts to me discovering my Top/Domina side. Not that one has to be a Top if one has a cock, oh no. I know that is not true, and that is not what I’m trying to imply. However, for me, there was a bit of power that I was wielding due to being the penetrator and I not only got back in touch with my cock, but I also got back in touch with that side of me that enjoys wielding that power.

Honestly, when I bought my Leo he was a butch cock. I was much more butch in high school before figuring out my side and embracing it. I really did and do butch genders, and I really enjoyed playing with a butch on my own body, something that I still play with on occasion, I do own a black pinstripe suit and a few ties, I do enjoy going to the drag king side of my personality, as opposed to the drag queen which is my primary expression.

So, while I still my butch cock, he is not quite me anymore. I have also used him quite enough on myself, which seems a little strange for my cock to have been used inside me. Perhaps this is a small point, and I think it is in some ways, but it is what I feel. It’s not that I don’t think that I could use my cock within myself, I just have used it maybe too many times. I Leo for me, and for packing, and for fucking, but it’s not my cock anymore, it’s a dildo.

My cock needs to be . And my new cock needs to be scarlet. My scarlet cock is going to be gorgeous, and will make my lovers salivate at the thought of it, and it will be my cock. My cock will have a expression as well. She will be fabulous and perfect. And I’m not limiting myself to just one cock, but I need a primary one.

I found a fabulous red glitter cock at Cahoots, a sex toy/novelty store not too far from my house. However, I’m not sure how I feel about having the balls attached. It could be interesting, but, may not be quite right. But I LOVE the red glitter. It kind of makes me think of The Wizard of Oz, which makes me want it even more. It is definitely a cock. The problem with it, too is it is jel-lee (which I would have to use a condom with, which isn’t horrible, but could be annoying) and I would much prefer a silicone cock.

The other I’ve been eyeing is General. The common problem of both of them is that they’re both rather thick (not to mention General is expensive!). That’s not always bad, and apparently I’m just drawn to having a big cock, which makes sense as it would fit the rest of me. However, I’m sure I would want to use it for anal play quite often, so that could be an issue. I would almost have to have a female partner before I could justify a cock which did not go well with anal play. Both dildos would be lovely for cock sucking, but I’m not sure how much Master is down with sucking my cock. My primary cock would need to be not as thick as the other two, but I would want to get the glitter one for style as well as function.

I’m enamored with Tiger as well as the P-Spot and Luxury. Perhaps getting P-Spot or Luxury and the Wizard of Oz (WoO) cock might be a perfect combination. The P-Spot is (as you could guess) made for the prostate, but I would guess that it would be nice for getting the g-spot during anal sex as well. The WoO cock may be best for receiving blow jobs and a nice vaginal cock (with condom). This may mean I need to invest in more condoms.

Any suggestions for other fabulous cocks for me to look at? I would like to refrain from the jelly if possible, but I have yet to find a cock as fabulous as the WoO cock.

technorati My Femme Cock delicious My Femme Cock stumbleupon My Femme Cock digg My Femme Cock google My Femme Cock linkedin My Femme Cock twitter My Femme Cock

Submit this content to FetSpank.com

Technorati Tags: , ,

Related posts:

Posted on 17th June 2008 at 21:58 by Scarlet Lotus Sexgeek
Filed under: Community: Queer, Identity: Queer Intellisexual
Tagged: ,

You all are, no doubt, tired of hearing about same-sex passing in the California supreme court by now (though who would be tired of hearing about something as wonderful of this, you say? Good question!). However, I will make this short and sweet and just want to send out happiness of all types to all those who have and will participate in the California legalization of gay marriage

Also, the country newly near and dear to my heart (remember: Master’s from there and we just went there in May for a few weeks), Norway legalized same-sex marriages. Previously, Norway had civil partnerships, but did not have the right to church weddings or to be considered as adoptive parents. There are wonderful things going on for equality everywhere!

Now, personally, I think these examples of equality are wonderful, and I believe that is a wonderful declaration of between two people. I always tear up at weddings, I can’t deny that. I think that any commitment ceremony is beautiful, and I think that it is wonderful that people of the same sex can now marry each other 100% legally with all the same rights and privileges as other sex marriages.

That said, I do have some problems with . It is by and large a religious institution of a religion I am not associated with. I’m not against the idea of a legal contract between two (or more) consenting adults for child and/or tax purposes and things like that. However, calling it (a religious term) and making it basically mandatory for other sex couples who live together for a certain amount of time (as it varies between states) is just ridiculous.

Personally, I don’t intend to get married, possibly ever, though I may be forced into one of those common law marriages at some point, or I would get married to Master if/when we move to Europe (thereby making me a citizen of Norway and making it much easier for me to move over there). Or, if we were to have children I would probably marry him, though I’m not sure that will ever happen. I just don’t believe in the institution of , nor do I think it is necessary for me, except in the above mentioned circumstances.

I used to say I wouldn’t have an other sex before same sex marriages were legal, and, well, that’s not completely true yet, but it’s definitely getting closer. I still wouldn’t do so until it’s legal all over the states, except for the moving to Europe scenario. My other problem with is that it is confined to two people. Although I do not want for myself, I would like consensual adult polyamorous to be a reality, and I think it will someday, just not for quite some time.

However, legalization of same sex in California is also reason number one billion six hundred fifty eight thousand and one to move to San Francisco. Just counting down until 2009, now.

technorati In Case Youre Hiding Under a Rock Somewhere delicious In Case Youre Hiding Under a Rock Somewhere stumbleupon In Case Youre Hiding Under a Rock Somewhere digg In Case Youre Hiding Under a Rock Somewhere google In Case Youre Hiding Under a Rock Somewhere linkedin In Case Youre Hiding Under a Rock Somewhere twitter In Case Youre Hiding Under a Rock Somewhere

Submit this content to FetSpank.com

Technorati Tags: ,

Related posts:

Posted on 31st December 2007 at 11:59 by Scarlet Lotus Sexgeek
Filed under: Community: Queer, Identity: Queer Intellisexual
Tagged: , , , , , ,

I suffer from heterosexual guilt. I am currently with a man (as most/all of you know), and I feel guilty for the privilege that affords me. I desire women more, have always desired women more, but I happen to have fallen in with a man. Deeply, passionately in . He’s heteroflexible, basically, but not interested in the community, though he loves my activist side he is not an activist himself.

I feel like I’m cheating on my lesbian and I’m cheating and gaining privilege from being with him. I almost forget what it’s like to be with a woman. We’re poly, so I have that chance afforded to me, and happily I would take it were I to meet someone who that situation would be acceptable for, and I have little doubt that and I will do things, as that situation is acceptable to her, but I want more.

In an odd way, I feel like I should be marginalized, because I’m and I feel I should be, because I generally prefer women.

Back to writing my paper on as a trans identity. It rocks, and I am going to post it once I’m done.

technorati Heterosexual Guilt delicious Heterosexual Guilt stumbleupon Heterosexual Guilt digg Heterosexual Guilt google Heterosexual Guilt linkedin Heterosexual Guilt twitter Heterosexual Guilt

Submit this content to FetSpank.com

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Related posts:

Posted on 1st October 2007 at 0:46 by Scarlet Lotus Sexgeek
Filed under: Identity: Queer Intellisexual
Tagged: , , , , ,

The question of bisexuality comes back to the question of in general, and if sexualities are made or innate or a third option. In the study of male arousal the conclusion was that, by genital arousal alone, there is no such thing as bisexuality. This also brings up the question of what constitutes a sexual orientation. Are bisexuals people who are only physically aroused by one body type but who are mentally aroused or desirous or emotionally bonded to other body types, or who are indiscriminatory as to the type of body their lover has. If we can learn to be attracted to different body types for whatever reason, doesn’t that mean that everyone could be bisexual? Is it just mental blocks which keep people from being bisexual?

The issues around the term and existence of bisexuality as outlined in (Con)tested Identities are ones which I have muddled around in my brain for quite some time. I am currently with a male partner, though, over the last ten years or so (ever since I had a conscious thought about sexual orientation) I have identified as anywhere from lesbian to bisexual. At the same time, I wouldn’t ascribe to him strictly a masculine . A further question: how does play into sexual orientation? Is it all about bodies? What about a bisexual who only likes the masculine , regardless of body? Would ze be bisexual but monogendered? Do we really need to dig that far into it anyway?

How does bisexual sexual orientation change dependent on the relationship the person is in at the time? I happen to have a female (sort of) lover as well, does that mean that I am a “real” bisexual while others may not be because they practice monogamy? I noticed how this isn’t exactly addressed, though the ideas of promiscuity and fidelity are. Does it make a difference that my partner is also bisexual? Does it matter?

I too have felt distanced from the community when I mention I have a male partner, though I don’t openly admit to my . I use the term partner freely but have caught myself saying “boyfriend” at work instead and realize my aims at using the term, the ability I have to use heteronormative terms to quell the question that my using partner arises. Is this wrong of me? I am invoking heterosexual privilege because I can. I am acting like the bisexual threat to queerness perhaps.

From (Con)tested Identities: “dissatisfaction with existing results in the development and exploration of the utility of alternative , for example… “pansexual,” “polyamorous” and “polysexual.” A number of other participants also discuss variously using alternate terms like “hetero-flexible,” “ freak” and “ non-specific.” This made me think of a couple things, to be explored. The last town I lived in, alternate terms such as pansexual or multisexual were well known in the community, however, when I moved here I’ve been asked what I mean when I say pansexual or multisexual or (my personal favorite and invention) intellisexual (which I generally explain before I even have the chance to be asked—attracted to minds not bodies), I was also told “I’ve only heard one other person use that term.” This may just be because that was Southern Oregon (Ashland) and this is Utah, and I think that plays a large part in it, but even in the community it is unknown, and this makes me wonder.

Where and how do these ideas travel? Are they simply word of mouth, are they by academic literature such as we are reading? Are they through taking oriented classes and questioning? How does the community thrive? How are do discursive spread?

Also the quote: “And, the irony is that in a second I would bring my girlfriend to, you know, straight events and it’s like, you know, this is, this is my girlfriend, deal with it. Like I’m so ready to do that. But so not ready to like bring a man to a gay function and say this is my boyfriend, deal with it. (PI6)” From what I’ve revealed I would assume it’s obvious where this hits home for me. For the first time in my life, really, I am in a solid relationship with a male which is the longest of my life, and I am also feeling uncomfortable in situations. For the first year after I moved here I was rather avoidant of getting into situations (bad term), and still rather am. I was the president of the student union at my previous university and the founder of the GSA at my high school, and yet now I’m worried to attend events?

Is this simply something in me now? I think part of it is. I feel ashamed that I’m with a male, yet claim intellisexuality or multisexuality or queerness in general. My lesbian butch dyke sister calls herself , can I claim the same identity, or is that blasphemous? I really do feel that I am in the middle, unsure of what I can and cannot claim, though knowing that I don’t want to claim heterosexuality, though I jokingly will say that I’m “half heterosexual.”

technorati Bisexuality delicious Bisexuality stumbleupon Bisexuality digg Bisexuality google Bisexuality linkedin Bisexuality twitter Bisexuality

Submit this content to FetSpank.com

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Related posts:

Posted on 19th September 2007 at 16:31 by Scarlet Lotus Sexgeek
Filed under: Identity: Queer Intellisexual
Tagged: ,

This was brought up in my Gender and Sexual Orientation class today, I’ve heard of the grid before but not looked for it. I found a nifty little test. It’s much better than the kinsey scale, more inclusive of different aspects of and sexual orientation.

Klein Sexual Orientation Grid
I scored an average of 3.76

0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Heterosexual Bisexual Homosexual

MeaningThis result can also be related to the Kinsey Scale:

0 = exclusively heterosexual
1 = predominantly heterosexual, incidentally homosexual
2 = predominantly heterosexual, but more
than incidentally homosexual
3 = equally heterosexual and homosexual
4 = predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally
heterosexual
5 = predominantly homosexual, incidentally heterosexual
6 = exclusively homosexual

Summary
The idea of this exercise is to understand exactly how dynamic a person’s sexual orientation can be, as well as how fluid it can be over a person’s lifespan. While a person’s number of actual homo/heterosexual encounters may be easy to categorize, their actual orientation may be completely different. Simple like “homosexual”, “heterosexual”, and “bisexual” need not be the only three options available to us.

Take the quiz

technorati Klein Sexual Orientation Grid delicious Klein Sexual Orientation Grid stumbleupon Klein Sexual Orientation Grid digg Klein Sexual Orientation Grid google Klein Sexual Orientation Grid linkedin Klein Sexual Orientation Grid twitter Klein Sexual Orientation Grid

Submit this content to FetSpank.com

Technorati Tags: ,

Related posts: